Cobweb spiders

This is a species of spider that has successfully colonized the dark corners of our house: so far S_ found me three specimens to photograph in December and January (two females and a male). I could tell that one of them was male because he had enormously swollen pedipalps, which I understand means he was ready to mate. He was within a few inches of one of the females, so we suspect that he was courting her when he was caught.

malespiderdorsal2008-1-1.jpg

I was trying to get a good idea of the size and arrangement of the eyes, because that’s one of the features that is useful for identifying them, but man, are they hard to make out. In this face shot, I can only really see a few of the eyes, but from the way the ones I can see are spaced it looks like there are eight eyes arranged in two horizontal rows of four each.

malespiderface2008-1-1.jpg

You can see on the females that their pedipalps are much smaller than the male. In this shot, you can also see the first female’s “chelicerae”, which are her mouthparts. They are closed at the moment, they open sideways to expose a pair of fangs that unfold kind of like a pocket knife.

femalespider2face2008-1-1.jpg

These are pretty cold-tolerant spiders, they weren’t slowed down much by refrigeration. In fact, they went ahead and spun webs right there in the jar. Very minimalist webs, mainly just a bunch of apparently random strands, and they would hang pretty much in the middle of them, like this:

femalespider2sideonweb2008-1-1.jpg

This next one is the second female, you can see that she has a much bigger abdomen than the male does[1]. She also has a pattern of “dimples” on her abdomen that he didn’t have.

femalespiderdorsaldimples2008-1-1.jpg

Based on the kind of web that they made, I figured that they were probably some sort of cobweb weaver, possibly in the genus Steatoda. I actually posted some of these pictures on BugGuide in hopes that somebody might be able to confirm this, but I only got one response from a person who said it looked like a Steatoda hespera. This is a possibility, I suppose, but it doesn’t really look quite right and it would be nice if some expert could confirm it. It probably won’t happen, though, since positive species ID of spiders usually needs a microscope and a view of the underside of the female.

Anyway, since we’re finding them in the middle of the winter, it is safe to say that they are part of our house fauna and not just incidental visitors from outside. In addition to these relatively clear shots, I have pictures of what are probably two more[2][3] that we spotted last spring: one because it was busy working on killing and eating a centipede about five times its size:

spiderwithcentipede.jpg

and one that had somehow caught a tick:

spiderwithtick.jpg

They certainly have ambition, I’ll grant them that. In particular, eating a large centipede like that was probably pretty risky, considering that centipedes are also carnivorous. The tick was probably no danger to the spider, but the web it was in was about 5 feet from the floor, and it is unusual that a tick would have crawled up so high.

———-
[1] These pictures are using a different grid than usual. Sam had been playing with my photography dish, and the 1 mm graph paper circle got lost. So, these are photographed on the only other graph paper I could find at the moment, which had a 0.2 inch grid (about 5 mm)

[2] It’s a little hard to be sure if they are the same species, because the pictures from last spring came out a bit blurry, but they are certainly consistent with being the same species. I don’t think anybody can prove that they aren’t.

[3] I think I actually already posted a picture of a male of this species, back almost a year ago. At the time, I thought it was a mesh-weaving spider, but now I’m not so sure.

Other articles related to this topic:

6 Comments

  1. Andy:

    The picture of the spider killing a centipede is pretty cool. I’m wondering how often that technique is successful - my understanding is that centipedes can be pretty nasty (to insects their own size, anyway). Pretty cool for the spider that can take it on and win.

  2. Tim Eisele:

    It’s too bad the spider vs. centipede came out so blurry. This was actually one of the first spider pictures I took, and I was still having trouble getting the macro mode to work right at the time. I did get a very short video of it, which is actually a bit clearer.
  3. Wanderin_Weeta:

    These look to me like the common American house spider, Achearanea tepidariorum. I have a series on my blog on these: I’ve been watching one particular spider for a full summer, and now am keeping an eye on her egg cases.

    You can see my blog posts and photos here, or on Flickr.

    And yes, these spiders are quite able to take on prey twice and more their size. My “Fat Momma” regularly grabbed big moths and crane flies.

  4. Wanderin_Weeta:

    Hmm. I posted a comment, but it doesn’t seem to have come up. Is it because I included links?

    I wrote a series on this spider on my blog, wanderinweeta AT blogspot Dot come. Click on the link for Achearanea tepidariorum in the labels. And there are dozens of photos on my Flickr page: WWW DOT flickr DOT com /photos/87137766 AT N00/sets/72157603376675514/

    Whew! This at least comes up in Preview. Fingers crossed: here goes Submit.

  5. Wanderin_Weeta:

    Oh. Now the first comment did show up. Sorry about the spamming.

  6. Tim Eisele:

    Nice pictures of your spiders in action! Thanks for the pointer, they certainly do look like, if not the same species, at least a closely related one.

    And about the comments getting held up for moderation: I’ve been caught by that a few times on other people’s blogs. At least with the spam filters used with Wordpress blogs, you can get away with one link, but two links generally makes it get flagged as possible spam. I wish we didn’t have to worry about that, but even a low-traffic site like this one gets hit with about 4-5 machine-generated spam comments for every real one.

Leave a comment