<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barklouse nymph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/</link>
	<description>A Field Guide to the North Side of Old Mill Hill, Atlantic Mine, MI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>Ew Gross!  I have fond memories of the Cootie game -- if you start that petition, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ew Gross!  I have fond memories of the Cootie game &#8212; if you start that petition, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K T Cat</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>K T Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>As usual, you rock.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, you rock.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Eisele</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Eisele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m just now getting into SLR macrophotography[1] instead of using a kludged-together setup using a consumer-grade point-and-shoot, so take my advice for what it&#039;s worth. But anyway:

The serious insect macrophotographers like &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrmecos.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alex Wild&lt;/a&gt; tend to use Canon gear, evidently Canon has made a serious effort to claim the macrophotography market and have the best macro lenses. As a result, I mostly have been looking at Canon. The lens that Wild uses for his real serious high-mag macro work doesn&#039;t have an equivalent from any other manufacturer, unfortunately.  However, the other lens that is very popular with the insect macrophotographers (and that Nikon probably has a near-equivalent for) is the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 Macro.  You are probably a lot more familiar with Nikon gear than I am, and can probably sort out the nearest Nikon equivalent.

As for where to get reduced-price lenses: there are a bunch of lens rental places, and S_ found out that they sometimes sell their excess lenses at steep discounts[2]. See for example &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lensrentals.com/for-nikon&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Nikon page at lensrentals.com&lt;/a&gt;.  If you go to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lensrentals.com/category/macro-and-specialty/for-nikon&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nikkor macro/specialty lens page&lt;/a&gt;, they have a well-organized collection of lenses with descriptions of each, and you can actually just rent one for a week or so to try out if you want to be sure of which one to go out and buy.

Alternatively, you can try getting a macro convertor and/or extension tubes for your existing lens.  This is a *lot* cheaper than a purpose-built true macro lens, and can allow very high magnification.  But, there are evidently some serious focusing issues and they force a lot of fiddling around to get set up for a close-up shot.

[1] Did you know you can now get some good DSLR bodies on the used market for about the same prices as a new point-and-shoot? I got a Canon 10D body from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keh.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;KEH Camera Brokers&lt;/a&gt; just last month, and even though it is still a pretty advanced camera with decent resolution and good performance, the used one cost about a tenth what it cost new.

[2] S_ bought me the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 macro lens for Christmas from Lensrentals.com, and gave it to me early to try out because they only allowed 3 days to return it at no cost if it turned out not to be what we wanted.  I&#039;ve only been experimenting with it for a couple of days, but I am very happy with it. It is in like-new condition, and appears to be an excellent lens that will be well-suited for actually getting macro pictures of live bees and butterflies in the field (as opposed to dead or refrigerated on my microscope stage).  The pictures from it will start showing up here as soon as (1) I work through some more of my picture backlog, (2) I work out how to use it to best advantage, and (3) enough small arthropods come out of hibernation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m just now getting into SLR macrophotography[1] instead of using a kludged-together setup using a consumer-grade point-and-shoot, so take my advice for what it&#8217;s worth. But anyway:</p>
<p>The serious insect macrophotographers like <a href="http://myrmecos.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Alex Wild</a> tend to use Canon gear, evidently Canon has made a serious effort to claim the macrophotography market and have the best macro lenses. As a result, I mostly have been looking at Canon. The lens that Wild uses for his real serious high-mag macro work doesn&#8217;t have an equivalent from any other manufacturer, unfortunately.  However, the other lens that is very popular with the insect macrophotographers (and that Nikon probably has a near-equivalent for) is the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 Macro.  You are probably a lot more familiar with Nikon gear than I am, and can probably sort out the nearest Nikon equivalent.</p>
<p>As for where to get reduced-price lenses: there are a bunch of lens rental places, and S_ found out that they sometimes sell their excess lenses at steep discounts[2]. See for example <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/for-nikon" rel="nofollow">the Nikon page at lensrentals.com</a>.  If you go to the <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/category/macro-and-specialty/for-nikon" rel="nofollow">Nikkor macro/specialty lens page</a>, they have a well-organized collection of lenses with descriptions of each, and you can actually just rent one for a week or so to try out if you want to be sure of which one to go out and buy.</p>
<p>Alternatively, you can try getting a macro convertor and/or extension tubes for your existing lens.  This is a *lot* cheaper than a purpose-built true macro lens, and can allow very high magnification.  But, there are evidently some serious focusing issues and they force a lot of fiddling around to get set up for a close-up shot.</p>
<p>[1] Did you know you can now get some good DSLR bodies on the used market for about the same prices as a new point-and-shoot? I got a Canon 10D body from <a href="http://www.keh.com/" rel="nofollow">KEH Camera Brokers</a> just last month, and even though it is still a pretty advanced camera with decent resolution and good performance, the used one cost about a tenth what it cost new.</p>
<p>[2] S_ bought me the Canon EF 100mm F2.8 macro lens for Christmas from Lensrentals.com, and gave it to me early to try out because they only allowed 3 days to return it at no cost if it turned out not to be what we wanted.  I&#8217;ve only been experimenting with it for a couple of days, but I am very happy with it. It is in like-new condition, and appears to be an excellent lens that will be well-suited for actually getting macro pictures of live bees and butterflies in the field (as opposed to dead or refrigerated on my microscope stage).  The pictures from it will start showing up here as soon as (1) I work through some more of my picture backlog, (2) I work out how to use it to best advantage, and (3) enough small arthropods come out of hibernation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K T Cat</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>K T Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>Hola, amigo!  Off topic: I was going to put a macro lens on my Christmas list for my Nikon D60.  They offer a bunch of different ones.  Do you have any recommendations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola, amigo!  Off topic: I was going to put a macro lens on my Christmas list for my Nikon D60.  They offer a bunch of different ones.  Do you have any recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K T Cat</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>K T Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>Man, those are industrial-strength antennae.  They&#039;re the insect world&#039;s version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://jproc.ca/rrp/kingston_electronics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the 35&#039; HF whip.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, those are industrial-strength antennae.  They&#8217;re the insect world&#8217;s version of <a href="http://jproc.ca/rrp/kingston_electronics.html" rel="nofollow">the 35&#8242; HF whip.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Eisele</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Eisele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>Ellen:  Maybe we should start a petition to get them to change &quot;cootie&quot; back to the old design!

KT: They don&#039;t actually have eight legs, what looks like a front pair of legs is actually just very long, robust antennae.  They do seem to be converging on something resembling a spider body plan, though, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellen:  Maybe we should start a petition to get them to change &#8220;cootie&#8221; back to the old design!</p>
<p>KT: They don&#8217;t actually have eight legs, what looks like a front pair of legs is actually just very long, robust antennae.  They do seem to be converging on something resembling a spider body plan, though, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K T Cat</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>K T Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>Are these guys related to spiders?  The body shape and 8 legs makes them look like cousins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these guys related to spiders?  The body shape and 8 legs makes them look like cousins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/2009/12/12/barklouse-nymph/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somethingscrawlinginmyhair.com/?p=1201#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Very cool!  My sister had one of those original Cootie games...and I must agree that the new ones are just stupid-looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool!  My sister had one of those original Cootie games&#8230;and I must agree that the new ones are just stupid-looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

