Light gray moth with a bald spot

2012 January 4

And here[1] we see the heartbreak of male-pattern baldness

Sam caught this rather nondescript moth for me on June 14, 2011. It was reasonably good-sized (about two centimeters long), but almost utterly lacking in anything I can use as identifying features. Here it is on Sam’s fingers, with its wings a bit spread:

Its most obvious feature is the bald spot on its back. Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem to be useful for species ID, because browsing around for “bald moth” pictures I find this bald patch cropping up on other moths that are otherwise not much like this one, and that gradually go bald. It looks like this moth was losing his hair gradually, and probably had a full coat of fuzz when he was younger. And I say “he” because his antennae are a bit on the feathery side.

Other than that, I’ve got no idea what kind of moth this is. Probably some kind of Noctuid, but that doesn’t narrow it down much. If anybody has a better notion of what it is, please let me know!

———–
[1] Yes, this is Wednesday, and up until now I have normally only posted on Saturdays. The thing is, I’ve built up quite a big buffer of postings (I’m writing this on October 2, so I’m three months ahead of myself right now [2]), and still have a huge backlog of pictures to process. So, I thought this year I could try going for two postings per week instead of one. You all can now expect a new creature (or, sometimes, updated photos of an old creature) both on Saturday morning and on Wednesday morning from here on.

[2] Update as this posting goes on-line: Even at two postings per week, I’ve not only been able to maintain that 3-month buffer, I’ve even extended it a month-and-a-half further, to the middle of May. So it looks like I’m not going to have any particular problems keeping up a twice-per-week schedule.

5 Responses leave one →
  1. January 4, 2012

    Midweek moths are fine, but it was confusing for a while there — I was going all “Whaaaaaaa? I’m sure I spent some time Sunday catching up on my blog reading!”

  2. January 5, 2012

    Surprise! :-)

  3. January 7, 2012

    That’s no bald spot, that’s the radome for the moth’s GPS receiver.

  4. January 8, 2012

    Ha!

    Actually, now that you mention it, I wonder if maybe having a bare spot helps it to detect the ultrasound pulses from hunting bats? All that fuzz would tend to muffle the sound. Boy, that would be hard to check experimentally, though.

  5. stacy carter permalink
    September 22, 2014

    what is this moths scientific name

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS